ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
Identification of plant-based spilled oils using direct analysis in real-time-time-of-flight mass spectrometry with hydrophobic paper sampling.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretation of α-Pinene Mass Spectra in APCI-Like Ambient Mass Spectrometry Using GC-Coupled Atmospheric Pressure Corona Discharge Ionization.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- HSQC-NMR spectroscopy and exploratory data analysis of crude oil residue in relation to the time of spill.RSC advances · 2025Article
- A high throughput ambient mass spectrometric approach for identifying the poaching of wild american ginseng.Environmental systems research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spilled plant-based oils behave very differently in comparison to petroleum oils and require different clean-up measures. They do not evaporate, disperse, dissolve, or emulsify to a significant degree but can polymerize and form an impermeable cap on sediment, smothering benthic media and resulting in an immediate impact on the wildlife community. The current study explored the application of rapid up-to-date direct analysis in real time (DART) with high-resolution mass spectrometry for plant-based oil typing. The study introduced a new concept of using hydrophobic paper to collect and analyze oil samples, thus minimizing sample preparation and expenses. Application of this technique showed its ability to speedily distinguish plant-based from petroleum-based oils. A microcosm experiment exposing plant-based oil samples to weathering processes for comparison with petroleum-based oils demonstrated the ability of the method to classify weathered oil samples and identify their source oil. It was observed that canola and peanut oil were the most resistant to weathering processes. The developed DART-TOFMS method was shown to be accurate for short-term weathered oil spills up to between 12 and 26 days of exposure. The developed method performed identification in less than a day compared to the established multi-day method for oil spill forensics requiring careful sample collection in glass containers, time-consuming laboratory clean-up, lengthy gas chromatography sequences, and careful integration including integration of retention time markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.