Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808310›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Machine learning prediction model for oral mucositis risk in head and neck radiotherapy: a preliminary study.

Elisa Kauark-Fontes, Anna Luiza Damaceno Araújo, Danilo Oliveira Andrade, Karina Morais Faria, Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro, Alexa Laheij, Ricardo Araújo Rios, Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho, Thais Bianca Brandão, Alan Roger Santos-Silva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elisa Kauark-FontesDepartment of Propaedeutic and Integrated Clinic, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. elisakauark@gmail.com.
Anna Luiza Damaceno AraújoHead and Neck Surgery Department, Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), University of São, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3725-8051
Danilo Oliveira AndradeDepartment of Computer Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7632-9462
Karina Morais FariaDental Oncology Service, Instituto Do Câncer Do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8795-5146
Ana Carolina Prado-RibeiroDental Oncology Service, Instituto Do Câncer Do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-7998
Alexa LaheijDepartment of Oral Medicine, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-2798
Ricardo Araújo RiosDepartment of Computer Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-4745
Luciana Maria Pedreira RamalhoDepartment of Propaedeutic and Integrated Clinic, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-4977
Thais Bianca BrandãoDental Oncology Service, Instituto Do Câncer Do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9128-3138
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaOral Diagnosis Department, Faculdade de Odontolodia de Piracicaba, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-6617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOral mucositis (OM) reflects a complex interplay of several risk factors. Machine learning (ML) is a promising frontier in science, capable of processing dense information. This study aims to assess the performance of ML in predicting OM risk in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.

methodsClinical data were collected from 157 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma submitted to radiotherapy. Grade 2 OM or higher was considered (NCI). Two dataset versions were used; in the first version, all data were considered, and in the second version, a feature selection was added. Age, smoking status, surgery, radiotherapy prescription dose, treatment modality, histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, presence of oral cancer lesion, and tumor location were selected as key features. The training process used a fivefold cross-validation strategy with 10 repetitions. A total of 4 algorithms and 3 scaling methods were trained (12 models), without using data augmentation.

resultsA comparative assessment was performed. Accuracy greater than 55% was considered. No relevant results were achieved with the first version, closest performance was Decision Trees with 52% of accuracy, 42% of sensitivity, and 60% of specificity. For the second version, relevant results were achieved, K-Nearest Neighbors outperformed with 64% accuracy, 58% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.

conclusionML demonstrated promising results in OM risk prediction. Model improvement was observed after feature selection. Best result was achieved with the KNN model. This is the first study to test ML for OM risk prediction using clinical data.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMachine LearningOropharyngeal NeoplasmsStomatitisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDecision TreesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsArtificial intelligenceHead and neck cancerOral mucositisPrediction model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.