ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Impact of trauma center status on radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the WIDI SIM exam.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether adult and pediatric trauma center status, as well as the presence of dedicated child protection teams, influences radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the Emergent/Critical Care Imaging Simulation (WIDI SIM) exam. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 639 WIDI SIM exam scores for four pediatric non-accidental trauma cases completed by radiology residents across 33 programs. Residents were stratified by level (R1-R4) and institutional factors, including adult trauma center status, pediatric trauma center status, and child protection team presence. Additionally, 2022 pediatric physical abuse counts per state were obtained from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and normalized between 0 and 1. We employed a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM). The outcome was regressed on resident level, trauma center status variables, child protection team presence, and normalized abuse counts.
resultsHigher resident training level was significantly associated with better performance (R1=3.6, R2=5, R3=6.1, R4=7.9; P<0.001). Adult trauma center accreditation was also associated with higher scores (4.6 vs. 3.3; P<0.001). In contrast, pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and normalized state-level abuse counts were not significantly associated with resident performance (all P>0.05).
conclusionResident experience and adult trauma center accreditation were significantly associated with better radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma in a simulated call environment. Pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and statewide abuse prevalence were not associated with detection performance. These findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions at non-adult trauma centers and emphasize the importance of experience in developing diagnostic proficiency for non-accidental trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.