ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Skeletal surveys for suspected infant abuse: patient-specific radiation dose estimation using a hybrid computational phantom.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiation Dose and Risk in the Radiological Investigation of Suspected Non-Accidental Injury (NAI).Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiographic skeletal survey plays an important role in the diagnosis of infant abuse. Some practitioners have expressed concerns about the radiation exposure from this examination.
objectiveTo utilize state-of-the-art hybrid computational phantoms to more accurately estimate radiation doses of skeletal surveys performed for suspected infant abuse. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched our imaging database to identify skeletal surveys performed for suspected infant abuse (5/2020-5/2022). Initial skeletal surveys consisted of 25 standardized radiographs while follow-up skeletal surveys consisted of 16 standardized radiographs (no frontal or lateral views of the skull; or lateral views of the spine, knees, and ankles). To estimate the patient-specific organ and effective dose, we applied the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for Radiography and Fluoroscopy (with on-the-fly 3D Monte Carlo simulation) to the male and female infant hybrid computational phantoms.
resultsThe mean total effective radiation dose was 0.627 mSv (initial survey) and 0.495 mSv (follow-up survey). For both surveys, the anteroposterior chest radiograph was the largest contributor to effective dose (contributing 0.101 mSv and 0.108 mSv, respectively). In the initial skeletal survey, the lens and the eyeballs received the highest organ absorbed doses (with the skull radiographs as the major contributors); and in the follow-up skeletal survey, the breasts received the highest organ absorbed dose (with the chest radiographs as the major contributors).
conclusionsWe employed hybrid computational phantoms to better estimate the radiation profile of skeletal surveys performed for suspected infant abuse, thus enabling us to update and optimize this life-saving imaging protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.