Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808248›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

The Current Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer.

Madison Cox, Dominic J Vitello, Akhil Chawla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madison CoxDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dominic J VitelloDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Akhil ChawlaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Akhil.Chawla@northwestern.edu.

Funding

National Institues of Health 5R38CA245095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Early identification is rare, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of less than 10%. Advances in the understanding of PDAC tumor biology are needed to improve these outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising novel biomarker in the identification and management of PDAC. Drawn from peripheral blood and analyzed using a variety of techniques, the detection of ctDNA in PDAC has been associated with shorter OS, minimal residual disease presence, and shorter recurrence-free survival. The use of ctDNA has also been examined as an indicator of therapeutic resistance, susceptibility to targeted therapy, and therapeutic response. While promising, ctDNA analysis is limited by its low rates of detection in some settings and lack of predictive ability in others. Many studies examining the utility of ctDNA for the management of PDAC have been relatively small retrospective cohort studies. The current findings will need to be validated by incorporation of ctDNA analysis into cancer registries and larger prospective studies. Given the current, rapid evolution in the field, it is possible that with time, ctDNA will be more routinely incorporated into the clinical management of PDAC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkerCirculating tumor DNADigital droplet PCREarly diagnosisMutant KRASNext-generation sequencingPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.