Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808200›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Prostate motion in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy and its impact on margins.

Johannes Kusters, René Monshouwer, Peter Koopmans, Markus Wendling, Ellen Brunenberg, Linda Kerkmeijer, Erik van der Bijl

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intra-adaptational motion during online adaptive radiotherapy: analysis of couch shifts and implications for margin design.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johannes KustersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. martijn.kusters@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8189-176X
René MonshouwerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter KoopmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Markus WendlingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ellen BrunenbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Linda KerkmeijerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erik van der BijlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study focused on reducing the margin for prostate cancer treatment using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy by investigating the intrafractional motion of the prostate and different motion-mitigation strategies.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed intrafractional prostate motion in 77 patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with five fractions of 7.25 Gy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance linear accelerator. Systematic drift motion was observed and described by an intrafractional motion model. The planning target volume (PTV) margin was calculated in a cohort of 77 patients and prospectively evaluated for geometric coverage in a separate cohort of 24 patients.

resultsThe intrafractional model showed that the prostate position starts out of equilibrium for the anterior-posterior (-1.8 ± 3.1 mm) and superior-inferior (1.7 ± 2.6 mm) directions, with relaxation times of 12 and 15 min, respectively. Position verification scans are acquired at 30 min on average. At that time, the transient drift motion becomes indistinguishable from the residual random intrafractional motion. PTV margins can be reduced to 1.8 mm (left-right), 3.2 mm (anterior-posterior), and 2.9 mm (superior-inferior). Evaluation of the overlap with the clinical target volume (CTV) was performed for a total of 120 fractions of 24 patients. The overlap range between the CTV and the PTV was 93-100% and the applied 3‑mm PTV margin for the CTV had a 99.5% averaged geometric overlap for all patients.

conclusionA PTV margin reduction to 3 mm is feasible. A patient-specific approach could reduce the margins further.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAgedDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesMargin reductionMR-LinacOnline adaptive radiotherapyProstate cancerTreatment strategy

Identifiers

PMID39808200
PMCPMC12283804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.