Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808119›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and the True Rate of Functional and Structural Progression in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study.

Giovanni Montesano, Alessandro Rabiolo, Giovanni Ometto, David P Crabb, David F Garway-Heath

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intraocular Pressure Matters.Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanni MontesanoNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Alessandro RabioloDepartment of Health Sciences, University Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy.
Giovanni OmettoNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
David P CrabbCity, University of London, Optometry and Visual Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
David F Garway-HeathNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of average intraocular pressure (IOP) on the true rate of glaucoma progression (RoP) in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study (UKGTS). Methods: UKGTS participants were randomized to placebo or Latanoprost drops and monitored for up to two years with visual field tests (VF, 24-2 SITA standard), IOP measurements, and optic nerve imaging. We included eyes with at least three structural or functional assessments (VF with <15% false-positive errors). Structural tests measured rim area (RA) with Heidelberg retina tomography (HRT) and average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness with optical coherence tomography (OCT). One eye of 436 patients (222 on Latanoprost) was analyzed. A Bayesian hierarchical model estimated the true RoP of VF and structural metrics, and their correlations, using sign-reversed multivariable exponential distribution. RA and pRNFL measurements were converted to a dB scale, matching the VF metric (mean deviation [MD]). The effect of average IOP on the true RoPs was estimated. Results: True RoP at the mean average IOP (17 mm Hg) was faster (P < 0.001) for VF-MD (-0.59 [-0.73, -0.48] dB/year) than HRT-RA (-0.05 [-0.07, -0.03] dB/year) and OCT-pRNFL (-0.08 [-0.11, -0.06] dB/year). The proportional acceleration of RoP per mm Hg increase was, however, not significantly different (smallest P = 0.15). Accounting for the structural floor-effect largely eliminated the differences in RoPs (smallest P = 0.25). Conclusions: VF appeared to deteriorate at a faster rate than structural measurements. However, this could be explained by the floor-effect from nonfunctional tissue. IOP induced a similar acceleration in RoP per mm Hg increase.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureVisual FieldsAgedAntihypertensive AgentsDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLatanoprostMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskAntihypertensive AgentsLatanoprost

Identifiers

PMID39808119
PMCPMC11737456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.