Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807956›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2025

Feasibility of IR-MALDESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging of PFAS.

Allen Martin, Alena N Joignant, Matt Farrell, Antonio Planchart, David C Muddiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allen MartinFTMS Laboratory for Human Health Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Alena N JoignantFTMS Laboratory for Human Health Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0890-5480
Matt FarrellDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Antonio PlanchartDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
David C MuddimanFTMS Laboratory for Human Health Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-499X

Funding

Uncovering the Mechanisms of PFAS-induced ImmunotoxicityP42ES031009 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI PLANCHART, ANTONIO J. · 2020 to 2024
$9.3M
TRAINING IN BIOCHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007046 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Seth William Kullman · 1985 to 2026
$5.1M
Development and Application of New Ionization Methods for Biological Mass SpectrometryR01GM087964 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MUDDIMAN, DAVID C. · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES031009NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007046NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087964NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of emerging contaminants that have been in use industrially since the 1940s. Their long-term and extensive commercial use has led to their ubiquitous presence in the environment. The ability to measure the bioconcentration and distribution of PFAS in the tissue of aquatic organisms helps elucidate the persistence of PFAS as well as environmental impacts. Traditional analysis by LC-MS/MS can measure total PFAS concentrations within an organism but cannot provide comprehensive spatial information regarding PFAS concentrations within the organism. In the current study, we used infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) to determine the limit of detection (LOD) of several PFAS utilizing a commercial standard mix spotted on mouse liver tissue. The traditional ice matrix and an alternative matrix, 1,8-bis (tetramethylguanidino)naphthalene (TMGN), were explored when determining the limits of detection for various PFAS by IR-MALDESI. The ice matrix alone resulted in a higher response than the combination of TMGN and ice. The resulting LOD for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) on a per voxel basis was 0.16 fmol/voxel. For comparison, zebrafish that were exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFOS, and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) at different concentrations were homogenized, and PFAS were extracted by solid-liquid extraction, purified by solid phase extraction, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS to determine the level of bioaccumulation in the zebrafish. PFOS resulted in the highest level of bioaccumulation (731.9 μg/kg, or 234.2 fg/voxel). A zebrafish that had been exposed to a PFAS mixture of PFOA (250 ng/L), PFOS (250 ng/L), and PFHxS (125 ng/L) was cryosectioned and analyzed by IR-MALDESI. Images could not be generated as the accumulation of PFAS in the sectioned tissue was below detection limit of the technique.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAlkanesulfonic AcidsAnimalsFeasibility StudiesLimit of DetectionLiverMiceTandem Mass SpectrometryAlkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsperfluorooctane sulfonic acidIR‐MALDESILC–MS/MSmass spectrometry imagingPFASzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID39807956
PMCPMC12180139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.