Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807955›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

From Lab to Clinic: Effect of Academia-Industry Collaboration Characteristics on Oncology Phase 1 Trial Entry.

Wonseok Yang, Sang-Won Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wonseok YangSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-7419-6578
Sang-Won LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5030-4924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the success rate of Phase 1 clinical trial entry and the factors influencing it in oncology projects involving academia-industry collaboration during the discovery and preclinical stages. A total of 344 oncology projects in the discovery stage and 360 in the preclinical stage, initiated through collaborations with universities or hospitals between 2015 and 2019, were analyzed. The Phase 1 clinical trial entry success rates for oncology collaborative projects were 9.9% from the discovery stage and 24.2% from the preclinical stage. For discovery stage contracts, strong statistical significance was observed for contract type (co-development OR 16.45, p = 0.008; licensing OR 42.43, p = 0.000) and technology (cell or gene therapy OR 3.82, p = 0.008). In contrast, for preclinical stage contracts, significant changes were noted for cancer type (blood cancer OR 2.24, p = 0.004), while the year of contract signing showed a relatively weak statistical significance (OR 1.24, p = 0.021). No significant changes were observed concerning partner firm size and the partnership territory. This study sheds light on how the characteristics of partnerships influence the success rates of early-phase research, providing valuable insights for future strategic planning in oncology drug development.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDrug IndustryMedical OncologyNeoplasmsAcademiaCooperative BehaviorHumansUniversitiesacademia‐industry collaborationclinical trial entrycollaboration characteristicsoncologyprobability of success

Identifiers

PMID39807955
PMCPMC11730079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.