ArticleCancer research communications2025
Real-World Incidence of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Alterations in Hispanics with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at a Large Academic Institution in Los Angeles.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring social determinants of health and immunotherapy utilization in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after definitive chemoradiation.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractRace and ethnicity affect the distribution of molecular alterations seen in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations are known to occur in 4% to 5% of the population, data specific to the Hispanic population remain limited. This study describes the real-world incidence of ALK alterations in Hispanic patients with NSCLC treated at a large academic institution in Los Angeles, California, United States, to further elucidate the underlying factors that shape differences in mutational profiles. A total of 607 patients with NSCLC treated at Los Angeles General Medical Center (n = 172) and the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (n = 435) who received comprehensive genomic profiling were evaluated from January 2015 to June 2023. The Fisher exact test and multivariate logistic regression were incorporated for statistical analysis. Hispanic patients exhibited a higher incidence of ALK alterations (12.76%, n = 18/141) than non-Hispanic patients (5.36%, n = 23/466; P = 0.0046). Multivariate logistic regression showed that Hispanic ethnicity (HR, 2.393; 95% confidence interval, 1.115–5.092) and age at diagnosis (HR, 0.9325; 95% confidence interval, 0.9081–0.9558) were significant variables in ALK alteration incidence, and 55.81% (n = 24) of ALK alterations were initially found via comprehensive genomic profiling. This study highlights a significantly higher incidence of ALK alterations among Hispanic patients with NSCLC, emphasizing the impact of race and ethnicity on molecular alterations. Future research is required to evaluate this trend in a larger, more diverse cohort and investigate the roles of environmental factors and tumor microenvironments in influencing ALK alteration prevalence. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identified a higher incidence of ALK alterations in Hispanic patients with NSCLC (12.76%) compared with that in non-Hispanic patients (5.36%) treated at a large academic center in Los Angeles, highlighting the impact of race on molecular alteration profiles and emphasizing the need to increase access to molecular analyses for this population. The variability in mutational alterations may be influenced by biological and environmental factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.