ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2025
Impact of Nonhepatectomy Opioid Reduction Efforts on Posthepatectomy Opioid Prescription: Analysis of 2,005 Patients.
Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent Improvement in Opioid Perceptions and Prescribing for Cancer Surgery: 5-Year Follow-Up.Advances in cancer education and quality improvement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathway-driven, postpancreatectomy opioid reduction interventions have proven effective and sustainable and may have a "halo effect" on other major abdominal cancer operations. This study aimed to analyze the sequential effects of expanding opioid reduction efforts from pancreatectomy on opioids prescribed after hepatectomy. STUDY
designThis was a retrospective cohort study using data from the electronic health record and a prospective quality improvement database for consecutive hepatectomy patients (September 2016 to February 2024). Cohorts were based on 5 distinct eras of opioid-related protocol updates E1 (preintervention historical baseline): September 2016 to March 2017; E2 (introduction of 5x-multiplier): April 2017 to September 2018; E3 (departmental opioid education program): October 2018 to December 2019; E4 (initial posthepatectomy pathways): January 2020 to June 2022; and E5 (updated pancreatectomy pathways influencing hepatectomy care): July 2022 to February 2024).
resultsOf 2,005 patients, 31% underwent major hepatectomy, 14% intermediate, 46% minor, and 9% combination surgery/other. Most (79%) patients were performed via an open approach. The median hospital stay decreased from 5 to 4 days between E1 and E5. Both intraoperative (E1, 80 mg; E5, 37 mg; p < 0.001) and total inpatient (E1 181 mg, E5 86 mg; p < 0.001) median oral morphine equivalents were reduced by >50%. A 73% reduction in discharge oral morphine equivalents was observed between E1 (225 mg) and E5 (60 mg; p < 0.001), with clinically similar median pain scores at discharge (scores 1 to 2 of 10). Concurrent universal adoption of routine 3-drug nonopioid discharge prescriptions (E1 70%, E5 98%) correlated with the proportion of patients discharged opioid-free (E1 8%, E5 43%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsDirected opioid reduction efforts for pancreatectomy influenced clinically meaningful posthepatectomy reductions in inpatient and discharge opioid volumes. A "halo effect" of intradepartmental opioid reduction efforts is attainable and corresponds to measurable increases in opioid-free or nearly opioid-free discharges after major abdominal cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.