ReviewClinical and translational science2025
Navigating Recent Changes in Dosing Information: Dynamics of FDA-Approved Monoclonal Antibodies in Post-Marketing Realities.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are critical components in the therapeutic landscape, but their dosing strategies often evolve post-approval as new data emerge. This review evaluates post-marketing label changes in dosing information for FDA-approved mAbs from January 2015 to September 2024, with a focus on both initial and extended indications. We systematically analyzed dosing modifications, categorizing them into six predefined groups: Dose increases or decreases, inclusion of new patient populations by body weight or age, shifts from body weight-based dosing to fixed regimens, and adjustments in infusion rates. Among the 86 mAbs evaluated, 21% (n = 18) exhibited changes in dosing information for the initial indication, with a median time to modification of 37.5 months (range: 5-76 months). Furthermore, for mAbs with extended indications (n = 26), 19.2% (n = 5) underwent dosing changes in their first extensions, with a median time to adjustment of 31 months (range: 8-71 months). Key drivers for these adjustments included optimizing therapeutic efficacy, addressing safety concerns, accommodating special populations, and enhancing patient convenience. We also discuss the role of model-informed drug development, real-world evidence, and pharmacogenomics in refining mAb dosing strategies. These insights underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and data integration in the post-marketing phase, providing a foundation for future precision medicine approaches in mAb therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.