ArticleHeliyon2025
Sleep stages classification based on feature extraction from music of brain.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep stages classification one of the essential factors concerning sleep disorder diagnoses, which can contribute to many functional disease treatments or prevent the primary cognitive risks in daily activities. In this study, A novel method of mapping EEG signals to music is proposed to classify sleep stages. A total of 4.752 selected 1-min sleep records extracted from the capsleep database are applied as the statistical population for this assessment. In this process, first, the tempo and scale parameters are extracted from the signal according to the rules of music, and next by applying them and changing the dominant frequency of the pre-processed single-channel EEG signal, a sequence of musical notes is produced. A total of 19 features are extracted from the sequence of notes and fed into feature reduction algorithms; the selected features are applied to a two-stage classification structure: 1) the classification of 5 classes (merging S1 and REM-S2-S3-S4-W) is made with an accuracy of 89.5 % (Cap sleep database), 85.9 % (Sleep-EDF database), 86.5 % (Sleep-EDF expanded database), and 2) the classification of 2 classes (S1 vs. REM) is made with an accuracy of 90.1 % (Cap sleep database),88.9 % (Sleep-EDF database), 90.1 % (Sleep-EDF expanded database). The overall percentage of correct classification for 6 sleep stages are 88.13 %, 84.3 % and 86.1 % for those databases, respectively. The other objective of this study is to present a new single-channel EEG sonification method, The classification accuracy obtained is higher or comparable to contemporary methods. This shows the efficiency of our proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.