Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807405›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Expediated modeling of burn events results (EMBER): A screening-level dataset of 2023 ozone fire impacts in the US.

Heather Simon, James Beidler, Kirk R Baker, Barron H Henderson, Loren Fox, Chris Misenis, Patrick Campbell, Jeff Vukovich, Norm Possiel, Alison Eyth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heather SimonOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
James BeidlerOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Kirk R BakerOffice of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Barron H HendersonOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Loren FoxOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Chris MisenisOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Patrick CampbellCooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, Center for Satellite and Earth Science Research (CSER), George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Jeff VukovichOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Norm PossielOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
Alison EythOffice of Air and Radiation, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, PO Box 12055, RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Expedited Modeling of Burn Events Results (EMBER) dataset consists of 36-km grid-spacing Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) photochemical modeling for the summer of 2023. For emissions, these simulations utilized representative monthly and day-of-week anthropogenic emissions from a recent year and preliminary day-specific 2023 fire emissions derived using BlueSky pipeline. The base model run simulated ozone concentrations across the contiguous US during Apr 11-Sep 29, 2023. Two zero-out model runs simulated ozone levels that would have occurred in the US (1) in the absence of fire emissions ("Zero Fires") and (2) in the absence of only Canadian wildfire emissions ("Zero Canadian Fires"). Fire impacts on ozone were then estimated as the difference between ozone simulated in the base EMBER run compared to the ozone simulated in each of the zero out model runs. EMBER is presented as a screening level dataset due to the emissions limitations and the 36-km grid-spacing used in these simulations.

Indexed as

Air pollutionCMAQPhotochemical modelingSource attributionZero-out

Identifiers

PMID39807405
PMCPMC11728960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.