Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807383›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Survival outcomes among periviable infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different income countries and time periods.

Ying Xin Li, Yan Ling Hu, Xi Huang, Jie Li, Xia Li, Ze Yao Shi, Ru Yang, Xiujuan Zhang, Yuan Li, Qiong Chen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ying Xin LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yan Ling HuDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xi HuangDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie LiWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xia LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ze Yao ShiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ru YangDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiujuan ZhangDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiong ChenDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Periviable infants are a highly vulnerable neonatal group, and their survival rates are considerably affected by patient-, caregiver-, and institution-level factors, exhibiting wide variability across different income countries and time periods. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of periviable infants and compare rates among countries with varied income levels and across different time periods. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Cohort studies reporting survival outcomes by gestational age (GA) for periviable infants born between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation were considered. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Data pooling was achieved using random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Sixty-nine studies from 25 countries were included, covering 56,526 live births and 59,104 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Survival rates for infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of GA ranged from 7% (95% CI 5-10; 22 studies, Conclusion: Although the survival rates for periviable infants have improved over the past two decades, substantial disparities persist across different economic settings, highlighting global inequalities in perinatal health. Continued research and collaborative efforts are imperative to further improve the global survival and long-term outcomes of periviable infants, especially those in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022376367, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022376367.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesFetal ViabilityIncomeInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant MortalityDeveloping CountriesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancySurvival Rateextremely prematureinfantmeta-analysissurvivalsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39807383
PMCPMC11726316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.