SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024
Survival outcomes among periviable infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different income countries and time periods.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global inequities in the survival of extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Variation in Stabilization and Resuscitation Practices at Birth of Preterm Infants Among 12 National or Regional Neonatal Networks.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Does more granular data equal better bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction?Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Survival and pre-discharge outcomes of extremely preterm neonates: a single- center prospective cohort study from the United Arab Emirates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- A tale of two cities: global inequities at the limits of neonatal survival.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Survival without major morbidity in extremely preterm infants: a prospective multicenter study in Shenzhen, China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- From Surviving to Thriving: A Protocol-Driven Approach to ELGAN Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Morbidity and Mortality Trends in Preterm Neonates at the Limits of Viability: Retrospective Observations from One Greek Hospital.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periviable infants are a highly vulnerable neonatal group, and their survival rates are considerably affected by patient-, caregiver-, and institution-level factors, exhibiting wide variability across different income countries and time periods. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of periviable infants and compare rates among countries with varied income levels and across different time periods. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Cohort studies reporting survival outcomes by gestational age (GA) for periviable infants born between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation were considered. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence. Data pooling was achieved using random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Sixty-nine studies from 25 countries were included, covering 56,526 live births and 59,104 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Survival rates for infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of GA ranged from 7% (95% CI 5-10; 22 studies, Conclusion: Although the survival rates for periviable infants have improved over the past two decades, substantial disparities persist across different economic settings, highlighting global inequalities in perinatal health. Continued research and collaborative efforts are imperative to further improve the global survival and long-term outcomes of periviable infants, especially those in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022376367, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022376367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.