ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Ischemia during exercise stress testing, an indication of coronary vasomotor dysfunction?
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently it has been suggested that coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) may explain the high false-positive rate of exercise electrocardiographic stress testing (EST). However, patients with angina but non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) present with a broader spectrum of coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys), namely coronary artery spasm (CAS), CMD or a combination of both. We aim to investigate the diagnostic value of EST for the entire CVDys spectrum. Methods: We included patients who underwent coronary function testing (CFT) in the Radboud University Medical Center. For each patient we requested the most recent EST report. ESTs were denoted as positive for ischemia if clinically significant ST-segment depression was detected. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals for the diagnosis of CVDys and its endotypes. Results: Of the 105 included patients (87 % women, mean age 57 (±8) years), 22 (21 %) had ischemia during EST. CVDys was diagnosed in 94 patients (90 %), of whom 58 patients had an isolated endotype (CAS: n = 51, CMD: n = 7) and 36 patients had CAS and CMD. Ischemia during EST yielded a high specificity and PPV for CVDys (specificity: 100 % (71.5-100 %), PPV: 100 % (84.6-100 %)), which remained reasonably similar for CAS (specificity: 94.4 % (72.7-99.9 %), PPV: 95.5 % (77.2-99.9 %)), but was lower for CMD (specificity: 85.5 % (74.2-93.1 %), PPV: 59.1 % (36.4-79.3 %)). Conclusions: Ischemia during EST is highly specific for CVDys in general and can be an indicator for CAS and to a lesser extent for CMD in patients with ANOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.