ArticleCureus2025
Paradoxical Inflammatory Bowel Disease Induced by Golimumab in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report and Systematic Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upadacitinib for atopic dermatitis induced by secukinumab in patients with refractory ankylosing spondylitis:a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paradoxical reactions (PRs) to biologic medications, such as psoriasis, arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have been increasingly recognized. The aim of reporting this case is to establish an association between golimumab and exacerbation or new (de novo) IBD in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Our case involves a young patient with juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who developed de novo IBD following golimumab therapy for active spinal disease. The patient had no prior gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and AS symptoms significantly improved with golimumab. However, before the third dose, he experienced non-bloody diarrhea, mild abdominal cramping, and constitutional symptoms (fever, chills, and weight loss). Colonoscopy and biopsy confirmed unclassified IBD. The discontinuation of golimumab resulted in marked improvement in GI symptoms, but the recurrence of AS symptoms necessitated the initiation of infliximab, which resolved both AS and IBD symptoms. A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted (from 2008 to October 2024) on Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) Complete/PubMed and Scopus databases using both Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords related to golimumab, SpA, and paradoxical IBD. Data from included cases were extracted by two researchers, and the quality assessment of case reports was performed using a standardized tool. Four cases of paradoxical IBD development following golimumab treatment in patients with pre-existing IBD were identified. This is the first reported case of de novo IBD development in a biologic-naïve patient with AS treated with golimumab. This case highlights the importance of prompt evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms and early gastroenterology referral during biologic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.