ReviewResuscitation plus2025
Prehospital critical care beyond advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of multivariable risk adjustment models for return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in England.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Article
- Mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest: a retrospective observational study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Observational
- Advanced resuscitative interventions in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study of a physician-led pre-hospital team.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- The impact of interdisciplinary cardiac arrest teams on paramedic practise: an interpretive qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- The impact of additional special emergency medical service units on non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in a high-resource metropolitan area.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Benefits of targeted deployment of physician-led interprofessional pre-hospital teams on the care of critically ill and injured patients: the 'science' explained.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Benefits of targeted deployment of physician- led interprofessional pre-hospital teams on the care of critically ill and injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis - matters arising response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Benefits of targeted deployment of physician-led interprofessional pre-hospital teams on the care of critically ill and injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by prehospital critical care teams compared to non-critical care teams. Methods: This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and the eligibility criteria followed a PICOST framework for ILCOR systematic reviews. Prehospital critical care was defined as any provider with enhanced clinical competencies beyond standard advanced life support algorithms and dedicated dispatch to critically ill patients. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 20 April 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses of pooled data from studies at moderate risk of bias were performed using a generic inverse-variance with random-effects. Results: The search returned 6,444 results and 17 articles were included, reporting 1,192,158 patients. Three studies reported traumatic patients and one reported paediatric patients. All studies were non-randomised and 15 were at moderate risk of bias. Most studies included prehospital physicians (n = 16). For adult non-traumatic patients, the certainty of evidence was low and prehospital critical care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.35-2.82), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63), survival at 30 days (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.75), and favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.84). Prehospital critical care was also associated with improved outcomes for traumatic and paediatric patients and the certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusion: Attendance of prehospital critical care teams to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.