ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2025
Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryometamorphosis expression patterns of fruiting body development in the mushroom-forming fungusIMA fungus · 2026Article
- Changes in Volatile Compounds and Sensory Properties of Chicken withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Diversity of Fungal Secondary Metabolites and Their Emerging Applications in Healthcare and Environment.Mycobiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Experimental procedure: Rats received oral administrations of the low-dose formulation, medium-dose formulation, and high-dose formulation over 28 consecutive days as part of the UCMS protocols. The concentrations of serotonin, dopamine, and the corresponding metabolites in the rat prefrontal cortex and hippocampus were assessed. Blood samples were collected to examine corticosterone levels, and the brains were dissected for evaluating activated microglia morphologies and associated pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. Results and conclusion: The CM-AM formula effectively averted abnormal behaviors triggered by UCMS, such as anhedonia and hypoactivity, and decreased the turnover rate of monoamines in both the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. The formula mitigated the increase in serum corticosterone levels induced by chronic stress. Furthermore, the formula alleviated stress-induced microglia activation in the hippocampus, achieving this by down-regulating hyperactivated pro-inflammatory proteins and up-regulating hypoactivated anti-inflammatory proteins in the hippocampus. The antidepressant-like effects potentially stemming from the regulation of neurotransmitters and immunomodulation, likely by restoring the balance of M1 and M2 microglia fractions in the hippocampus. Consequently, the CM-AM formula could be explored as a prospective complementary and alternative therapy for depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.