ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Nonneutralizing antibodies in Nordic persons with moderate hemophilia A and B (the MoHem study).
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonneutralizing Antibodies in Haemophilia A Patients: To Be Ignored or Not to Be!Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of nonneutralizing antibodies (NNAs) in moderate hemophilia is elusive. Objectives: To explore the presence of NNAs in Nordic persons with moderate hemophilia A (MHA) and B (MHB) in relation to treatment modality, clinical outcome, history of inhibitor, and the corresponding factor VIII (FVIII)/factor IX (FIX) gene mutation. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter study covering persons with MHA and MHB in Sweden, Finland, and Norway. Inhibitors were analyzed with the Bethesda assay, and NNAs were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Plasma samples from 137 MoHem study participants (median age 29 years; Q1-Q3, 15-54) were analyzed. NNAs were present in 11 of 82 (13%) of people with MHA and 7 of 55 (13%) of those with MHB irrespective of prophylactic or on-demand treatment, most frequently after 150 exposure days (EDs). Three NNA positive patients had a history of high-titer inhibitor, but current analyses were negative (<0.6 BU/mL). Baseline FVIII/FIX activity was similar among NNA positive and negative patients. Current bleeding rates were low, but patients with NNAs captured a higher Hemophilia Joint Health Score (7 [median]; Q1-Q3, 3-20 vs. 4; 1-9) ( Conclusion: NNAs were detected in 13% of Nordic persons with MHA and MHB, most frequently after 150 EDs. Patients with NNAs had more severe hemophilic arthropathy than patients without NNAs. The relationship between NNAs and clinical outcome in hemophilia should be further explored in a large cohort including pharmacokinetics and longitudinal observations with repeated blood sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.