ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2025
Optimising data sharing whilst protecting participant privacy: a data note describing processed data from a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for women with false positive screening test results.
Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moving towards openness: introduction to the registered reports and data notes article collection.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The present article describes the processed data generated in a qualitative interview study and template analysis. Many women find the experience of being recalled and receiving a false-positive breast screening test result to be distressing. The interview study aimed to understand breast screening healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of providing care during the recall process and when receiving false-positive screening test results, including their communication with women around false-positive screening test results. Methods: Twelve HCPs from a single screening unit in the English National Health Service Breast Screening Programme participated in semi-structured interviews in 2020. All participants were female. A range of HCPs roles were recruited, including advanced radiographer practitioners, breast radiographers, breast radiologists, clinical nurse specialists, and radiology healthcare assistants. The data were analysed thematically using template analysis from a limited realist perspective. Results: A total of 20 data files are described, reflecting the iterative nature of template analysis. The files report various versions of codes, subthemes, themes, and every template produced during analysis. The files are publicly available on the Open Science Framework and UK Data Service (ReShare). Discussion: This data note outlines our approach to conducting a template analysis of qualitative data while protecting highly identifiable data, which is stored in a non-public archive and only available to the study team. It offers a practical, worked example of the template analysis process, thereby providing a detailed illustration beyond the concise summaries typically found in published reports, and complementing methodological papers of template analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.