ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Student perceptions of U.S. based school day physical activity best practices in relation to accelerometer-based sedentary behavior and activity.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine associations between student perceptions of school physical activity best practices and accelerometer-based physical activity during school days. Methods: The sample was 758 students in grades 3rd-4th or 6th-7th (female-58 %; 31 % Black/African American) from 33 schools across five school districts in a Mid-Atlantic state in the U.S. Students completed the Perceptions of the Environment at School survey to assess perceived implementation of 11 school physical activity best practices and wore an Actical ankle accelerometer for 7 days between 2017 and 2019. Accelerometer cutpoints were applied for percent time in sedentary, light, and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during school hours. Adjusted mixed effects linear regression models were used to predict percent time in each physical activity category, with separate models for elementary and middle school. Results: More best practices were perceived by elementary versus middle schoolers (sum score = 3.3 versus 1.5, Conclusions: Few best practices were perceived as being implemented in school. Elementary schoolers who perceived more best practices spent more time in light activity and less in sedentary behavior, but this relationship was not found among middle schoolers. Future research should promote implementation of school physical activity best practices and examine the linkage between implementation, student perceptions, and behavior change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.