Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807153›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Survival and quality of life after first-time diagnosis of brain metastases: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

Olav Erich Yri, Guro Lindviksmoen Astrup, Astrid Telhaug Karlsson, Rene van Helvoirt, Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Kristin Moksnes Husby, Jon Håvard Loge, Jo-Åsmund Lund, Tonje Lundeby, Ørnulf Paulsen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ionizing Radiation Enhances Prognostically Significant Cellular Immunity Programs in the Brain Metastasis Microenvironment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olav Erich YriDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Guro Lindviksmoen AstrupDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Astrid Telhaug KarlssonDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Rene van HelvoirtDepartment of Oncology, Sorlandet Hospital Trust, PO Box 416 Lundsiden, Kristiansand, 4604, Norway.
Marianne Jensen HjermstadDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Kristin Moksnes HusbyDepartment of Surgery, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, PO Box 800, Drammen, 3004, Norway.
Jon Håvard LogeDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Jo-Åsmund LundClinic for Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, PO Box 1600, Ålesund, 6026, Norway.
Tonje LundebyDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Ørnulf PaulsenEuropean Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute for Clinical Medicine, PO Box 1171, Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway.
Eva SkovlundDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Marius-Ioan TaranDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, PO Box 2168, Tønsberg, 3103, Norway.
Rebecca Rootwelt WintherDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Nina AassDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Stein KaasaDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A major concern in anticancer treatment (ACT) of brain metastases (BM) is exposing patients with short expected survival to treatments that negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Such futile ACT at the end of life is time-consuming and burdensome for patients and their families and entails unnecessary healthcare costs. Refraining from ACT is challenging for both physicians and patients. This study aimed to provide real-life data on survival after BM diagnosis and patient reported outcomes (PROs) after ACT to identify risk factors for futile treatment and to support BM treatment decisions. Methods: This multi-center, prospective, observational study recruited consecutive patients with first-time BM from November 2017 to March 2021. Patients were followed until death or study end (October 1st, 2023). Clinical factors associated with survival were analyzed by the Cox' proportional hazards model. Changes in PROs after BM treatment were described according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, survival, and treatment groups. Findings: For the total cohort ( Interpretation: Patients with ECOG 2-4, especially those with uncontrolled extracranial metastases and ≥5 BM, are at risk for futile ACT. BM treatment guidelines should strongly caution against ACT to patients with expected survival <6 months and specifically advise against WBRT. Funding: The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; The Norwegian Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Anticancer treatmentBrain metastasesFutile treatmentRadiotherapyTreatment decisions

Identifiers

PMID39807153
PMCPMC11728971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.