Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807144›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2024

Trends in female applicants to Canadian ophthalmology residency programs from 1998-2020.

Heather M McDonald, Stephanie L Cote, Austin McMillan, Sapna Sharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The CMEJ in phases: closing out 2024, closing in on 2030.Canadian medical education journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather M McDonaldDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ivey Eye Institute, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie L CoteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of South California, California, USA.
Austin McMillanSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Sapna SharanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ivey Eye Institute, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ophthalmology has historically been a male-dominated specialty. Despite there being a higher proportion of females in Canadian medical schools since the early 2000s, it is unknown if trends in female applicants and those accepted to ophthalmology have followed suit. This study aims to evaluate trends in gender representation of ophthalmology applicants to Canadian residency programs from 1998 to 2020 and to compare those trends to other surgical specialties. Methods: We obtained aggregate data of the annual number of male and female applicants ranking and successfully matching to ophthalmology as their first-choice specialty from the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) database. We then carried out a retrospective cross-sectional analysis on the publicly available data. Subsequently, we compared trends in female applicants to ophthalmology, as well as female practicing ophthalmologists, to other surgical disciplines. Results: The proportion of female applicants increased from 24.3% in 1998 to 33.3% in 2020 ( Conclusions: Although the proportion of female applicants is increasing, there is a recent plateau and an inability to equalize the female-to-male ratio in ophthalmology. Further studies are needed to identify potential barriers and mitigate possible residual gender biases.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceInternship and ResidencyOphthalmologyPhysicians, WomenCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39807144
PMCPMC11725010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.