ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Robust multi-read reconstruction from noisy clusters using deep neural network for DNA storage.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly biased DNA sequence reconstruction in DNA storage with multi-scale attention mechanism and contrast learning.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Efficient trace reconstruction in DNA storage systems using bidirectional beam search.iScience · 2025Article
- A generative adversarial network for multiple reads reconstruction in DNA storage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transformer technology in molecular science.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA holds immense potential as an emerging data storage medium. However, the recovery of information in DNA storage systems faces challenges posed by various errors, including IDS errors, strand breaks, and rearrangements, inevitably introduced during synthesis, amplification, sequencing, and storage processes. Sequence reconstruction, crucial for decoding, involves inferring the DNA reference from a cluster of erroneous copies. While most methods assume equal contributions from all reads within a cluster as noisy copies of the same reference, they often overlook the existence of contaminated sequences caused by DNA breaks, rearrangements, or mis-clustering reads. To address this issue, we propose RobuSeqNet, a robust multi-read reconstruction neural network specifically designed to robustly reconstruct multiple reads, accommodating noisy clusters with strand breakage, rearrangements, and mis-clustered strands. Leveraging the attention mechanism and an elaborate network design, RobuSeqNet exhibits resilience to highly-noisy clusters and effectively deals with in-strand IDS errors. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method are validated on three representative next-generation sequencing datasets. Results demonstrate that RobuSeqNet maintains high sequence reconstruction success rates of 99.74%, 99.58%, and 96.44% across three datasets, even in the presence of noisy clusters containing up to 20% contaminated sequences, outperforming known sequence reconstruction models. Additionally, in scenarios without contaminated sequences, it exhibits comparable performance to existing models, achieving success rates of 99.88%, 99.82%, and 97.68% across the three datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.