ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025
Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When I say autonomy.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaternity care professionals need to guide women through an increasing number of decision-making processes during pregnancy. Professionals tend to focus more on providing information than on decision support. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), professionals could help women make their own choices by fulfilling their three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness through autonomy-supportive interactions. This study aimed to quantify autonomy-supportive and autonomy-thwarting interactions that professionals use during prenatal consultations and their association with women's perceptions of the healthcare climate during consultations.
methodsA quantitative observation study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in the Netherlands from March to October 2020. Twenty-three maternity care professionals in 2 hospitals and 16 midwifery practices were purposefully sampled. During 104 prenatal consultations, professional interactions were audiotaped and coded using the Coding and Observing Need-Supportive Consultation in Maternity Care Consultations. The woman's perceived healthcare climate was assessed using the Healthcare Climate Questionnaire.
resultsWe observed that professionals derive their autonomy-supportive interactions from a small repertoire. They tend to use more autonomy-supportive interactions (mean=2.31, SD=0.58) that give room to the woman than interactions that stimulate active engagement (mean=1.41, SD=0.80). During structuring interactions, they tend to use more informative (mean=1.81, SD=0.59) than supportive interactions (mean=0.94, SD=0.55). Women generally perceived the healthcare climate as positive.
conclusionsWomen were rarely stimulated to be actively engaged in the consultations, while active woman engagement is vital in offering women-centered decision-making support. Professionals could improve their autonomy-supportive consultation climate by paying explicit attention to interactions involving women and offering structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.