ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Deep learning radiomics analysis for prediction of survival in patients with unresectable gastric cancer receiving immunotherapy.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based radiomics and pathomics for decoding tumor microenvironment and predicting immunotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic vulnerability shaped by the microenvironment: multi-omics and AI biomarkers for precision surgical planning in gastrointestinal tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Immunotherapy has become an option for the first-line therapy of advanced gastric cancer (GC), with improved survival. Our study aimed to investigate unresectable GC from an imaging perspective combined with clinicopathological variables to identify patients who were most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Method: Patients with unresectable GC who were consecutively treated with immunotherapy at two different medical centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital were included and divided into the training and validation cohorts, respectively. A deep learning neural network, using a multimodal ensemble approach based on CT imaging data before immunotherapy, was trained in the training cohort to predict survival, and an internal validation cohort was constructed to select the optimal ensemble model. Data from another cohort were used for external validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed to evaluate performance in predicting survival. Detailed clinicopathological data and peripheral blood prior to immunotherapy were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of imaging models and clinicopathological variables was also applied to identify the independent predictors of survival. A nomogram based on multivariable logistic regression was constructed. Result: A total of 79 GC patients in the training cohort and 97 patients in the external validation cohort were enrolled in this study. A multi-model ensemble approach was applied to train a model to predict the 1-year survival of GC patients. Compared to individual models, the ensemble model showed improvement in performance metrics in both the internal and external validation cohorts. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) among patients with different imaging models based on the optimum cutoff score of 0.5 (HR = 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.10-0.37, Conclusion: The deep learning model in combination with several clinical factors showed predictive value for survival in patients with unresectable GC receiving immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.