ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2026
Public awareness of medical emergency telephone numbers: a scoping review.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Prehospital Emergency Care Resources in Urban and Rural Rwanda Using the WHO Health System Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prompt activation of emergency medical services (EMS) constitutes the fundamental component of bystander response to time-dependent health crises. A clear understanding of the public ability to access EMS can help to guide interventions aimed at enhancing community preparedness for emergencies. This review was conducted to summarize studies that examined public knowledge of emergency phone numbers. This scoping review encompassed articles published since 2004 that reported the proportion of subjects who knew emergency phone numbers. Data sources included PubMed, Google Scholar, and references of included articles. Relevant data from eligible publications were extracted manually to an author-developed data-charting sheet and analyzed descriptively. Forty-eight articles were analyzed. Reported studies, mostly cross-sectional surveys, were conducted in 26 countries, including 16 high-income, 9 middle-income, and 1 low-income country. The percentage of subjects who knew emergency numbers varied from 0% to 97.8% (median, 64.3%; interquartile range [IQR], 32.8%-80.0%). For high-income countries, the median was significantly higher than for low- and middle-income nations (69.6% [IQR, 54.1%-84.2%] vs. 34.6% [IQR, 19.4%-61.5%], P=0.003). The studies were generally inconsistent regarding the association of subjects' sociodemographic factors with knowledge of emergency numbers, suggesting the existence of geography-specific patterns. Available studies observed low community knowledge of emergency numbers, especially in low- and middle-income countries, and suggest that the problem has a global scale. Further research efforts are required to determine the best strategies for enhancing the public ability to access EMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.