Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806962›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

The Value of Using Quantitative MRI based on Synthetic Acquisition and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Monitor Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Activity.

Abdullah H Abujamea, Fahad B Albadr, Arwa M Asiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdullah H AbujameaDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-6922
Fahad B AlbadrDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.
Arwa M AsiriDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common disabling central nervous system diseases affecting young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool for diagnosing and following up multiple sclerosis. Over the years, many MRI techniques have been developed to improve the sensitivity of MS disease detection. In recent years synthetic MRI (sMRI) and quantitative MRI (qMRI) have gained traction in neuroimaging applications, providing more detailed information than traditional acquisition methods. These techniques enable the detection of microstructural changes in the brain with high sensitivity and robustness to inter-scanner and inter-observer variability. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using these techniques to avoid administering intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for assessing MS disease activity and monitoring. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-two known MS patients, aged 20 to 45, were scanned as part of their routine follow-up. MAGnetic resonance image Compilation (MAGiC) sequence, an implementation of synthetic MRI, was added to our institute's routine MS protocol to automatically generate quantitative maps of T1, T2, and PD. T1, T2, PD, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) data were collected from regions of interest (ROIs) representing normalappearing white matter (NAWM), enhancing, and non-enhancing MS lesions. The extracted information was compared, and statistically analyzed, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

resultsThe mean R1 (the reciprocal of T1) value of the non-enhancing MS lesions was 0.694 s-1 (T1=1440 ms), for enhancing lesions 1.015 s-1 (T1=985ms), and for NAWM 1.514 s-1 (T1=660ms). For R2 (the reciprocal of T2) values, the mean value was 6.816 s-1 (T2=146ms) for nonenhancing lesions, 8.944 s-1 (T2=112 ms) for enhancing lesions, and 1.916 s-1 (T2=522 ms) for NAWM. PD values averaged 93.069% for nonenhancing lesions, 82.260% for enhancing lesions, and 67.191% for NAWM. For ADC, the mean value for non-enhancing lesions was 1216.60×10-6 mm2/s, for enhancing lesions 1016.66×10-6 mm2/s, and for NAWM 770.51×10-6 mm2/s. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that enhancing and non-enhancing MS lesions significantly decrease R1 and R2 values. Non-enhancing lesions have significantly lower R1 and R2 values compared to enhancing lesions.

conclusionConversely, PD values are significantly higher in non-enhancing lesions than in enhancing lesions. For ADC, while NAWM has lower values, there was minimal difference between the mean ADC values of enhancing and non-enhancing lesions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisAdultBrainContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultContrast MediaApparent diffusion coefficient.Gadolinium-based contrast agentsMultiple sclerosesProton densityQuantitative MRIRelaxation timesSynthetic MRI

Identifiers

PMID39806962
PMCPMC13080435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.