Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806934›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2025

Impact of Preventive Intravenous Amiodarone on Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Chan-Juan Gong, Xiao-Kai Zhou, Zhen-Feng Zhang, Yin Fang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chan-Juan Gong *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China, 86 2568303569.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-9265
Xiao-Kai Zhou *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China, 86 2568303569.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-9856
Zhen-Feng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China, 86 2568303569.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-0952
Yin FangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China, 86 2568303569.ORCID 0000-0001-8175-4805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a vicious arrhythmia usually generated after removal of the aortic cross-clamp (ACC) in patients undergoing open-heart surgery, which could damage cardiomyocytes, especially in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Amiodarone has the prominent properties of converting VF and restoring sinus rhythm. However, few studies concentrated on the effect of amiodarone before ACC release on reducing VF in patients with LVH. Objective: The study was designed to explore the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous amiodarone in reducing VF after the release of the ACC in patients with LVH. Methods: A total of 54 patients with LVH scheduled for open-heart surgery were enrolled and randomly divided (1:1) into 2 groups-group A (amiodarone group) and group P (placebo-controlled group). Thirty minutes before removal of the ACC, the trial drugs were administered intravenously. In group A, 150 mg of amiodarone was pumped in 15 minutes. In group P, the same volume of normal saline was pumped in 15 minutes. The primary outcome was the incidence of VF 10 minutes after removal of the ACC. Results: The incidence of VF was lower in group A than in group P (30% vs 70%, P=.003). The duration of VF, the number of defibrillations, and the defibrillation energy were also lower in group A than in group P (P<.001, P=.002, and P=.002, respectively). After the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, the heart rate and mean arterial pressure were lower in group A, and the mean pulmonary arterial pressure and the dose of vasoactive drugs were higher than those in group P (P<.001, P<.001, P=.04, and P=.02, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the use of vasoactive-inotropic agents and hemodynamic status between the 2 groups before the end of surgery. Conclusions: In patients with LVH who undergo open-heart surgery, amiodarone can be safely used to reduce the incidence of VF, the duration of VF, the frequency of defibrillation, and the energy of defibrillation after ACC removal.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCardiac Surgical ProceduresHypertrophy, Left VentricularVentricular FibrillationAdministration, IntravenousAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia Agentsamiodaroneaortic cross-clampclinical trialdefibrillationeffectivenessleft ventricular hypertrophyopen-heart surgeryrandomized controlled trialRCTreperfusion ventricular fibrillationsurgeryventricular fibrillationvicious arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID39806934
PMCPMC11745488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.