ArticleChemMedChem2025
Protonation Effects in Protein-Ligand Complexes - A Case Study of Endothiapepsin and Pepstatin A with Computational and Experimental Methods.
Article in ChemMedChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding pH-dependent structural dynamics of CHIKV nsP2 protease: insights from computational antiviral targeting.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Thermodynamic Data Remain a Hot Tip for Decoding Binding Affinity and Water Impact on Protein-Ligand Complex Formation to Assist Lead Optimization.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Protonation Effects in Protein-Ligand Complexes - A Case Study of Endothiapepsin and Pepstatin A with Computational and Experimental Methods.ChemMedChem · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protonation states serve as an essential molecular recognition motif for biological processes. Their correct consideration is key to successful drug design campaigns, since chemoinformatic tools usually deal with default protonation states of ligands and proteins and miss atypical protonation states. The protonation pattern for the Endothiapepsin/PepstatinA (EP/pepA) complex is investigated using different dry lab and wet lab techniques. ITC experiments revealed an uptake of more than one mole of protons upon pepA binding to EP. Since these experiments were performed at physiological conditions (and not at pH=4.6 at which a large variety of crystal structures is available), a novel crystal structure at pH=7.6 was determined. This crystal structure showed that only modest structural changes occur upon increasing the pH value. This lead to computational studies Poisson-Boltzmann calculations and constant pH MD simulation to reveal the exact location of the protonation event. Both computational studies could reveal a significant pKa shift resulting in non-default protonation state and that the catalytic dyad is responsible for the uptake of protons. This study shows that assessing protonation states for two separate systems (protein and ligand) might result in the incorrect assignment of protonation states and hence incorrect calculation of binding energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.