ArticleBMJ open2024
Understanding barriers and facilitators to non-pharmaceutical chronic pain research engagement among people living with chronic pain in the UK: a two-phase mixed-methods approach.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesChronic pain treatment engagement is dominated by pharmaceutical methods, while previous research has assessed barriers to uptake of non-pharmaceutical treatments, there has not been research one step earlier in the treatment development pipeline; assessing barriers to take part in research that develops non-pharmaceutical chronic pain treatment methods.
designA two-phase approach was used to assess barriers and facilitators to research participation for people living with chronic pain. Online focus groups were run in phase 1, generating qualitative data, while phase 2 used the themes identified within phase 1 to assess agreement and disagreement.
settingParticipants consisted of people with chronic pain across the UK.
participants36 participants with chronic pain conditions (defined as any pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 months) were recruited for phase 1. Seven participants could not attend their focus group or a subsequent session, leaving a final sample size of 29 participants (83% female, 17% male; age=20-78 years, M=44.3 years). Phase 2 consisted of 103 participants (89% female, 10% male, 1% prefer not to say; age=20-80 years, M=46.6 years).
resultsPhase 1 identified the largest barrier to be 'distrust', relating to a distrust of medical and research professionals, distrust of confidentiality assurances and distrust that the research would have an impact. The greatest facilitator identified was 'improved accessibility', which related to the accessibility of the research environment, the type of research being conducted and accessible advertisement of the research within trusted settings. Phase 2 found around 80% agreement with all facilitator themes and a mix of opinions regarding barrier themes, highlighting the individuality of barriers experienced when living with chronic pain.
conclusionsAddressing the barriers and implementing the facilitators identified here ensures that patient participants are comfortable and safe within research environments. Furthermore, this project provides recommendations for researchers to follow to help increase patient engagement in research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.