ArticleBMJ open2024
Work-related temporary hearing loss and associated factors among textile industry workers in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was designed to assess occupational noise exposure levels, prevalence of temporary hearing loss and associated factors among textile industry workers in Amhara region, Ethiopia.
designAn institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted between June and July 2022. Participants were selected via a simple random sampling technique.
settingTextile industry workers in Bahir Dar and Kombolcha.
participantsA total of 413 study participants were included in the data analysis. PROCEDURES AND ANALYSIS: The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Area noise exposure levels in different work sections were measured using a sound level meter. Data analysis was done using Stata Version 14.0 software. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with temporary hearing loss. Adjusted OR with 95% CI and p-value<0.05 were used to determine statistical significance.
resultsA total of 413 workers participated in the study with a response rate of 97.9%. The age of respondents ranged from 22 to 59 years (median age 32 years). The prevalence of work-related temporary hearing loss was 38.7% (95% CI 34.14% to 43.6%). Weaving department (AOR=6.6, 95% CI 3.06 to 14.3) and higher sound pressure level (>90 dBA) (AOR=7.9; 95% CI 2.6 to 23.7) were significantly associated with work-related temporary hearing loss among textile workers.
conclusionsThe prevalence of work-related temporary hearing loss among textile industry workers was high. Weaving department and higher sound pressure level were significantly associated with work-related temporary hearing loss. Implementation of noise reduction measures, particularly in the weaving department, should be prioritised. Provision and enforcement of the use of hearing protection devices and establishment of regular hearing screening programmes to monitor workers' auditory health are advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.