ArticleBMJ open2024
Feasibility and acceptability of multiple methods of recording injecting drug use episode data among people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia: a pilot evaluation study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOpioid overdose and blood-borne virus transmission are key health risks for people who inject drugs. Existing study methods that record data on injecting drug risks mostly rely on retrospective self-reporting that, while valid, are limited to being broad and subject to recall bias. The In-The-Moment-Expanded (ITM-Ex) study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of multiple novel data collection methods to capture in situ drug injecting data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ITM-Ex will purposively recruit 50 participants from an existing longitudinal cohort (SuperMIX study) of people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia. Over a 4-week study period, participants will be asked to complete baseline/endline spirometry, continuously wear a heart rate monitoring device, complete short-form ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires for every injecting episode during the study period and return previously used needles/syringes for drug residue testing. These multiple data sources will be combined to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the physiological and risk characteristics of an estimated 800 individual injecting drug use episodes (if participants inject four times weekly). Finally, post-participation qualitative interviews will explore the acceptability of the data collection methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for ITM-Ex was obtained from Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (project number 368/22). Results will be disseminated via national and international scientific and public health conferences and peer-reviewed journal publications.Results from ITM-Ex may demonstrate vastly more complete and accurate methods of capturing data on injecting drug use risk and support future development and evaluation of devices to monitor and intervene during drug overdose. Further, ITM-Ex may demonstrate innovative methodologies to support myriad future public health research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.