Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806676›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Enabling participation in community-dwelling children and young people with acquired brain injuries and their families: a theory-based, evidence-based and person-based approach to intervention development.

Rachel Keetley, Joseph C Manning, Jade Kettlewell, Jane Williams, Emily Bennett, Victoria Lyon, Kate Radford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel KeetleyCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK rachel.keetley1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-1523
Joseph C ManningNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-4169
Jade KettlewellSchool for Primary Care Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jane WilliamsNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0469-4698
Emily BennettNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Victoria LyonPPIE, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Kate RadfordCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-3180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo codesign and develop an intervention to promote participation and well-being in children and young people (CYP) with acquired brain injury (ABI) and family caregivers.

designA complex intervention development study including a scoping review, mixed-methods study, co-design workshop and theoretical modelling.

settingCommunity-dwelling participants in one geographical region of the UK.

participantsCYP with ABI (5-18 years) and their parents, health, education, social care and voluntary/third-sector practitioners.

resultsThe intervention development process using a theory-driven and evidence-informed approach, combining the Behaviour Change Wheel and the person-based approach is described. Findings from the scoping review and mixed-methods study were analysed and synthesised using the framework method and the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Evidence of identified participation needs, barriers and facilitators was presented at the codesign workshop. The findings demonstrate the significant long-term impact of an ABI on CYP participation and both CYP and parent well-being with significant unmet family needs. Barriers and facilitators were identified, with key barriers being lack of knowledge and understanding, lack of parental and family support and a need for cross-sector collaboration and communication. Stakeholders identified potential solutions and intervention ingredients, such as the need for education for families and schools regarding long-term impact of ABI, and longer-term practical and emotional support for families. Findings from the workshop were analysed using the framework method and synthesised with previous findings using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Theoretical modelling enabled guiding principles to be identified and an intervention logic model to be produced. 'ABI-Participate' is a novel, multifaceted intervention, developed with CYP with ABI, their parents and professionals from across health, education, social care and charity sectors. Using a case coordination model, ABI-Participate aims to address the unmet needs and barriers of this population and includes needs assessment, goal setting, action planning, health coaching, practical and emotional support for families and multiagency liaison and collaboration, adopting an individualised needs-based approach.

conclusionA systematic process using a theory-based, evidence-based and person-based approach resulted in a novel, codesigned, multifaceted intervention, grounded in an in-depth understanding of CYP with ABI participation needs, barriers and facilitators. Further development and refinement of the individual elements of ABI-Participate and the care pathway to support its implementation are now required prior to feasibility testing.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCaregiversIndependent LivingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleParentsUnited KingdomAdolescentsBrain InjuriesPAEDIATRICSPsychosocial InterventionQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39806676
PMCPMC11667374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.