Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806663›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods.

Rita Kabra, Kathryn Church, Komal Preet Allagh, Abdulmumin Saad, Moazzam Ali, Petrus Steyn, James Kiarie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rita KabraDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland kabrar@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-2035
Kathryn ChurchIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
Komal Preet AllaghDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2135
Abdulmumin SaadIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
Moazzam AliDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6949-8976
Petrus SteynDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
James KiarieDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-7858

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and donor support exist in many countries to adopt and scale up a range of EBPs, including postpregnancy FP, task sharing for FP and the promotion of social and behaviour change (SBC) for FP. While there has been some success in implementing these practices, coverage remains inadequate in many countries. To gain a better understanding of the factors that may be hindering the sustained scale-up of these interventions, WHO has developed an assessment protocol to systematically identify the health systems' 'bottlenecks' to implementation and to then identify solutions and develop strategies to address them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed method approach that includes document review, secondary data analysis (from surveys, service delivery data and case studies) and key informant interviews with policymakers, programme managers, health providers and community groups will be used to identify bottlenecks. This will be followed by a workshop to prioritise bottlenecks and characterise their root causes. Finally, solutions for the root causes of prioritised bottlenecks will be proposed. The protocol is structured in a modular format, with separate modules on postpregnancy FP, task sharing and SBC. Assessment themes and questions are informed by a wide body of literature on the three programmatic components, as well as studies on health policy implementation and scale-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was exempt from ethical review by the WHO ethics committee. The findings of the bottleneck analysis will be presented at local, national and international conferences and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and webinars.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeFamily Planning ServicesContraceptionDeveloping CountriesFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchResearch DesignPostpartum PeriodProtocols & guidelinesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39806663
PMCPMC11664384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.