Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806645›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Scoping review of veterans' disclosure of mental health concerns or medical conditions in the workplace and other settings: study protocol.

Emma B Knight, Richard O'Quinn, Tarli Young, Justin P Brienza, Laura J Ferris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma B KnightBusiness School, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1032-4941
Richard O'QuinnBusiness School, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-0606
Tarli YoungSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Justin P BrienzaBusiness School, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Laura J FerrisBusiness School, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia l.ferris@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2127-1825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVeterans deal with 'unobservable' medical or mental health conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, at higher rates than the general population. Disclosure of such conditions is important to provide social, emotional, medical and mental health support, but veterans may face challenges when deciding whether to disclose conditions, including fear of stigma or discrimination. Safe disclosure in the workplace is particularly important, as it allows employees to gain accommodations and enables employers to manage workplace health and safety effectively. The objective of this study is to investigate the state of the literature on veterans' disclosure of mental health concerns or medical conditions and identify how it has been studied in the workplace context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To conduct the scoping review, several databases will be searched between 10 November 2023 and September 2024 including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, as well as theses databases. Sources will be uploaded to Covidence where two investigators will independently conduct title/abstract and full-text screening, with any conflicts resolved to consensus via discussion with a third investigator. Studies will be included if they are empirical, original research, focused on veterans and disclosure of mental health concerns or medical conditions and written in English. After inclusion, study information will be extracted including key findings about contexts, correlates, processes and outcomes of disclosure in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will provide insight into the state of the literature on veterans' disclosure of mental health or medical conditions, particularly in the workplace. Ethical approval is not required as the scoping review will be informed by publicly available data. Findings may be shared through journal articles or conference presentations, and recommendations will be provided to inform future research aimed at improving disclosure processes and outcomes. The scoping review has been pre-registered (https://osf.io/uxrjp).

Indexed as

DisclosureMental DisordersMental HealthVeteransWorkplaceHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSocial StigmaStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdult psychiatryHealth ServicesMENTAL HEALTHSocial SupportStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID39806645
PMCPMC11664356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.