ArticleBMJ open2024
Transition to home after very preterm birth: improving outcomes of children and their families-a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Transition to Home Care Model on the Outcomes of Premature Infants and Their Parents: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Implementing Outpatient Therapeutic Playgroups for NICU Families: A Quality Improvement Project.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedical progress has significantly improved the survival rates of very preterm-born infants in recent decades. Nevertheless, these infants are still at increased risk for long-term impairments as compared with term-born infants. While the homecoming of a preterm-born infant is long-awaited and brings relief to families, it also marks the end of intensive monitoring and highly specialised professional care. This situation often leaves parents coping with anxiety and a sense of unpreparedness, as they navigate the transition to home. Correspondingly, the WHO advocates for additional support for parents of preterm infants following the transition to home. According to the WHO, preparation for this transition yields positive effects on crucial aspects such as nutrition, parent-child interaction and parental well-being. However, there is significant heterogeneity as to which interventions are in place and regarding their level of efficacy. Consequently, we aimed to provide an overview of existing transition-to-home interventions and their efficacy by conducting a systematic review of the literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic review of interventions aiming at improving the transition to home process for very preterm-born infants and their parents and will search the following databases: Cochrane, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Our main aim is to provide an overview of existing transition-to-home interventions and their efficacy in categories of intervention types. We will not predefine specific outcomes, but we will describe, assess and summarise the outcomes of the included studies. All reported outcomes will be recalculated to the scale of standardised mean differences. Meta-analysis will be performed with a random-effects model to account for expected large between-study heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval was necessary for this study. The aim of our systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current interventions designed to improve the transition from hospital to home. Subsequently, it will show the individual effect of these interventions and pool effect sizes if possible. The most promising interventions will then be combined and used as the basis of a subsequent randomised controlled trial of a new transition-to-home intervention. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 30 August 2023. PROSPERO CRD42023455401.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.