Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806635›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2024

Effect of multiple counselling contacts along the continuum of care on use of postpartum family planning in a cohort of Ethiopian women: a dose-response analysis.

Anne Pfitzer, Gebi Husein Jima, Deborah Sitrin, Firew Ayalew, Saifuddin Ahmed

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03585361 (Utilizing All Health System Contacts to Offer Postpartum Family Planning), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03585361 nacompletednot on this map

Utilizing All Health System Contacts to Offer Postpartum Family Planning (PPFP) to Pregnant Women and Women Within Twelve Months Postpartum in Ethiopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorJhpiegoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled776ConditionsContraceptive Usage, Postpartum Family Planning, Contraception, Prenatal CareArmsHealth centers provide PPFP counseling and services, HEWs provide PPFP counseling and services, Volunteers (Development Army) promote PPFP, Health centers conduct data reviews, HEWs and volunteers track PPFP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne PfitzerMOMENTUM Country and Global Leadership, Jhpiego Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA anne.pfitzer@jhpiego.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-508X
Gebi Husein JimaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Oromia, Ethiopia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4917-1292
Deborah SitrinGlobal Program and Technical Excellence, Jhpiego Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Firew AyalewJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saifuddin AhmedPopulation, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDose-response analysis of the effect of each additional contact where family planning (FP) was discussed during antenatal, delivery, postnatal or immunisation visits on the uptake of postpartum family planning (PPFP) within 12 months.

designA cohort where pregnant women were enrolled and reinterviewed approximately 12 months postpartum. Life table analyses examined differentials in probabilities of adopting contraception over 12 months postpartum by level of exposure to FP counselling. Competing risks regression analysis examined the dose effects in HRs by the number of maternal, newborn or child health (MNCH) contacts where FP was discussed, adjusted for confounding covariates.

settingTwo Arsi zone woredas: Oromia and Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASURES: 722 pregnant women enrolled, and 706 successfully reinterviewed 12 months postpartum about each MNCH contact during pregnancy, delivery and later visits, whether these included any PPFP counselling and PPFP use. MAIN

resultsTwo-thirds of the cohort delivered at home. The average number of MNCH contacts women received was 7.6, while the average number where FP was discussed was 2.8. The cumulative probability of PPFP uptake was higher for women who received FP information during at least one MNCH contact, regardless of place of delivery. Each additional MNCH contact where FP was discussed increased the likelihood of PPFP uptake by 14% (95% CI 8% to 20%) or 9% (95% CI 5% to 13%), depending on place of birth. PPFP did not increase with additional contacts without FP information.

conclusionsWhile PPFP conversations immediately after a facility birth generated the greatest chance of affecting use, integrating at every visit in the continuum had more impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03585361.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesPostpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesContraceptionEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyYoung AdultEthiopiaHealth ServicesOrganisation of health servicesPostpartum WomenPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39806635
PMCPMC11667413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.