Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806610›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, four-way crossover trial to demonstrate the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for adrenal insufficiency in a healthy population: the STARLIT-2 study protocol.

Kathryn L Date, Kathleen Baster, Sharon L Caunt, Judith Cohen, Miguel Debono, Jane Fearnside, Trevor N Johnson, Richard J Ross, Rosie N Taylor, Charlotte J Elder

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathryn L DateHull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4476-3802
Kathleen BasterStatistical Services Unit, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sharon L CauntAcademic Directorate of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Judith CohenHull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Miguel DebonoAcademic Directorate of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jane FearnsideSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Trevor N JohnsonTranslational Sciences Group, Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.
Richard J RossClinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Rosie N TaylorStatistical Services Unit, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Charlotte J ElderClinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK C.J.Elder@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5593

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W029502/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCortisol is an essential stress hormone and failure of its production, known as adrenal insufficiency (AI), is associated with significant mortality due to adrenal crisis. The Short Synacthen Test (SST) is the current diagnostic test of choice for AI, but it is both invasive and resource intensive. Globally, there is an unmet need for a non-invasive, cost-effective test. A novel formulation, Nasacthin, has been developed, which can be delivered intranasally, with the resultant glucocorticoid levels measured in saliva instead of blood. The Salivary Test of Adrenal Response to Liquid Intranasal Tetracosactide (STARLIT-2) study aims to clinically validate the Nasacthin test in healthy volunteers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: STARLIT-2 is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, four-way crossover trial. 32 healthy adults and children will be randomised to receive each of four study drugs (Synacthen, Nasacthin and their respective placebos) over four study visits (one per visit). Paired blood and saliva samples will be collected from participants at baseline, and then at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after drug administration. Additional salivary samples will be collected at 180, 240, 360 and 480 min after drug administration. The primary outcome measures are to compare the mean serum cortisol at 30 min after Synacthen or Nasacthin dose, with a view to determine non-inferiority; and to compare the mean change from baseline in serum cortisol at 30 min after active and placebo doses of both Synacthen and Nasacthin, aiming to demonstrate superiority of active over placebo. In addition, the proportion of participants for which Nasacthin produces a rise above a preset serum cortisol threshold at 30 min will be determined, with the negative per cent agreement with the SST calculated using the SST as the reference standard. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study and its amendments have been reviewed and approved by South Central-Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, and feedback to trial participants will be facilitated following consultation with patient and public involvement and engagement groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN62724177.

Indexed as

Adrenal InsufficiencyCosyntropinHydrocortisoneAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultChildCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSalivaYoung AdultCosyntropinHydrocortisoneAdrenal disordersClinical TrialPaediatric endocrinologyRandomised Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39806610
PMCPMC11664370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.