ArticleBMJ open2024
Safe, effective and cost-effective oxygen saturation targets for children and adolescents with respiratory distress: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (OxyKids study).
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06016244 (Safe, Effective and Cost-Effective Oxygen Saturation Targets for Children and Adolescents With Respiratory Distress), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safe, Effective and Cost-Effective Oxygen Saturation Targets for Children and Adolescents With Respiratory Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the trial data: why conservative oxygenation targets require nuanced implementation in pediatric critical care.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLittle is known about the effectiveness and safety of oxygen saturation (SpO2) thresholds in children admitted with respiratory distress. The current 90%-94% threshold could lead to prolonged administration of supplemental oxygen, increased duration of hospital admissions, distress for children and families, and healthcare costs. To balance reducing unnecessary oxygen administration and preventing hypoxia, a lower SpO2 threshold of 88% for oxygen supplementation in children has been suggested. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that a lower SpO2 threshold of 88% safely reduces the length of hospital stay in children admitted with respiratory distress when compared with a 92% SpO2 threshold and to assess its cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms. A total of 560 children aged 6 weeks to 12 years admitted with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis, viral wheeze or lower respiratory tract infection will be recruited and equally randomised into an intervention or usual care arm. Intervention arm patients will receive supplemental oxygen if SpO2 falls below 88% or above 88% if deemed necessary by clinical staff. Control arm patients will receive supplemental oxygen if SpO2 falls below 92% or above 92% if deemed necessary by staff. The primary outcome is the time from admission to the time when all prespecified discharge criteria are met. Secondary outcomes are length of stay, safety (time to recovery, readmissions and paediatric intensive care admissions), quality of life, parental anxiety and societal costs. Patients are followed up by digital questionnaires up to 90 days postdischarge. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the research ethics committee (REC) of Leiden, Den Haag and Delft (EU CT number 2023-504817-56). Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or guardians. Parents of patients and patient representatives are involved in all stages of the study, from design to results, interpretation and dissemination. The results of this trial will be disseminated via lay publications, peer-reviewed scientific journals and academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06016244.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.