Trial reportBMJ open2024
Heavy slow resistance training, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy or advice for patients with tennis elbow in the Norwegian secondary care: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04803825 (The Feasibility of Heavy-slow Resistance Training, Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Feasibility of Heavy-slow Resistance Training, Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT) and Information and Advice. The NOrwegian Tennis Elbow (NOTE) Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, appointment adherence, intervention compliance, acceptance and comprehensibility, in addition to retention rate and data completeness. An ancillary aim was to describe within-group changes in the secondary outcome measures (patient-reported and performance-based).
designA single-centre, three-armed, randomised controlled feasibility trial with a parallel design, with follow-up after 3 and 6 months.
settingParticipants were recruited from the outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital.
participantsPatients with lateral epicondylalgia, commonly known as tennis elbow.
interventionsParticipants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to heavy slow resistance training, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy or information and advice.
main outcome measuresFeasibility was assessed according to a priori criteria for success.
resultsIn total, 89 patients were screened for eligibility, and 69 (78%) patients were eligible for randomisation. 60 (92%) participants were randomised which gave a recruitment rate of 3.4 per month (against an a priori success cut-off of 3.75). The participants rated all the interventions as acceptable and comprehensive. Only 6 of 19 (32%) did comply with heavy slow resistance training. Retention rate and completeness of data were successful at 3 months. At 6 months, the retention rate was below the criteria for success. Patient-reported and performance-based outcomes improved in all groups.
conclusionThe current study shows that the process of recruitment and the retention rate at follow-up can be feasible with minor amendments. Participants had low compliance with heavy slow resistance training mainly due to pain aggravation, which suggests that this intervention was not suitable for patients with tennis elbow. Shock wave therapy and information and advice should be investigated further in a full-scale randomised controlled trial including sham shock wave therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04803825.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.