ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025
New Library-Based Methods for Nontargeted Compound Identification by GC-EI-MS.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental characterization of Pleurotus tuber-regium-derived silver nanoparticles and antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Candida albicans.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Multi-Platform Metabolomics for Fraud Detection in Spices and Botanical Food Supplements: From Fingerprint Acquisition to Decision-Grade Evidence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cultivar to chemotype: characterizing complex botanicals with mass spectrometry metabolomics.Natural product reports · 2026Review
- Towards robust identification of Pleistocene adhesives: a critical review of current analytical approaches.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Effect of DifferentMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microwave-assisted extraction of phytochemicals fromFood chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Impact of Clove Essential Oil on the Intestinal Flora in Mice Infected withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibacterial properties ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has long been used to identify compounds in complex mixtures, this process is often subjective and time-consuming and leaves a large fraction of seemingly good-quality spectra unidentified. In this work, we describe a set of new mass spectral library-based methods to assist compound identification in complex mixtures. These methods employ mass spectral uniqueness and compound ubiquity of library entries alongside noise reduction and automated comparison of retention indices to library compounds. As a test data set, we used a publicly available electron ionization mass spectrometry data set consisting of 4833 spectra of particulate organic compounds emitted by combustion of wildland fuels. In the present work, spectra in this data set were first identified using the NIST 2023 EI-MS Library and associated batch process identification software (NIST MS PepSearch) using retention-index corrected Identity Search scoring. Resulting identifications and related information were then employed to parametrize other factors that correlate with identification. A method for identifying compounds absent from but related to those present in mass spectral libraries using the Hybrid Similarity Search is illustrated. Nevertheless, some 90% of the spectra remain unidentified. Through comparison of unidentified to identified mass spectra in this data set, a new simple measure, namely median relative abundance, was developed for evaluating the likelihood of identification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.