Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806561›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025

New Library-Based Methods for Nontargeted Compound Identification by GC-EI-MS.

Deborah F McGlynn, Lindsay D Yee, H Martin Garraffo, Lewis Y Geer, Tytus D Mak, Yuri A Mirokhin, Dmitrii V Tchekhovskoi, Coty N Jen, Allen H Goldstein, Anthony J Kearsley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Effect of DifferentMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibacterial properties ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deborah F McGlynnApplied and Computational Mathematics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Lindsay D YeeDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-9319
H Martin GarraffoBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.
Lewis Y GeerBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8189-3821
Tytus D MakBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-5640
Yuri A MirokhinBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.
Dmitrii V TchekhovskoiBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.
Coty N JenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3633-4614
Allen H GoldsteinDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-4896
Anthony J KearsleyApplied and Computational Mathematics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Stephen E SteinBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8362, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9384-3450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has long been used to identify compounds in complex mixtures, this process is often subjective and time-consuming and leaves a large fraction of seemingly good-quality spectra unidentified. In this work, we describe a set of new mass spectral library-based methods to assist compound identification in complex mixtures. These methods employ mass spectral uniqueness and compound ubiquity of library entries alongside noise reduction and automated comparison of retention indices to library compounds. As a test data set, we used a publicly available electron ionization mass spectrometry data set consisting of 4833 spectra of particulate organic compounds emitted by combustion of wildland fuels. In the present work, spectra in this data set were first identified using the NIST 2023 EI-MS Library and associated batch process identification software (NIST MS PepSearch) using retention-index corrected Identity Search scoring. Resulting identifications and related information were then employed to parametrize other factors that correlate with identification. A method for identifying compounds absent from but related to those present in mass spectral libraries using the Hybrid Similarity Search is illustrated. Nevertheless, some 90% of the spectra remain unidentified. Through comparison of unidentified to identified mass spectra in this data set, a new simple measure, namely median relative abundance, was developed for evaluating the likelihood of identification.

Identifiers

PMID39806561
PMCPMC11844893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.