Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806500›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Comparative analysis of regression algorithms for drug response prediction using GDSC dataset.

Soojung Ha, Juho Park, Kyuri Jo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soojung Ha *Department of Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Chungdae-ro 1, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.
Juho Park *Department of Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Chungdae-ro 1, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.
Kyuri JoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Chungdae-ro 1, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea. kyurijo@chungbuk.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-6346

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea NRF-RS-2023-00217022Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea NRF-RS-2023-00252745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug response prediction can infer the relationship between an individual's genetic profile and a drug, which can be used to determine the choice of treatment for an individual patient. Prediction of drug response is recently being performed using machine learning technology. However, high-throughput sequencing data produces thousands of features per patient. In addition, it is difficult for researchers to know which algorithm is appropriate for prediction as various regression and feature selection algorithms exist.

methodsWe compared and evaluated the performance of 13 representative regression algorithms using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset. Three analyses was conducted to show the effect of feature selection methods, multiomics information, and drug categories on drug response prediction.

resultsIn the experiments, Support Vector Regression algorithm and gene features selected with LINC L1000 dataset showed the best performance in terms of accuracy and execution time. However, integration of mutation and copy number variation information did not contribute to the prediction. Among the drug groups, responses of drugs related with hormone-related pathway were predicted with relatively high accuracy.

conclusionThis study can help bioinformatics researchers design data processing steps and select algorithms for drug response prediction, and develop a new drug response prediction model based on the GDSC or other high-throughput sequencing datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenomicsNeoplasmsHumansRegression AnalysisSupport Vector MachineDrug responseGDSC datasetGene expressionMultiomicsRegression

Identifiers

PMID39806500
PMCPMC11726955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.