ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
A framework for the continuous monitoring of person-centred hospital care: validation of a checklist for participatory service improvement.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2018, a nationwide survey carried out in 387 acute care hospitals from 16 out of 21 Italian regions, allowed defining an extended checklist for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness in hospital care. We aimed to validate a reduced set of core items for continuous use across the country.
methodsFactor analysis was used to validate the construct of the checklist. Varimax rotation with eigenvalues > 1 was used to optimize factor structure. Items with an item-total correlation > 0.30 and factor loadings > 0.4 were attributed to individual factors. Items with inter-item correlation coefficient > 0.70 were submitted to expert opinion for final decision. Overall internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.
resultsA total of 183 out of 243 items in the original checklist were submitted to factor analysis. A subgroup of 67 items was retained in 4 main areas, allocated as follows: 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Person-oriented organizational and care processes", 16 items in 4 sub-areas of "Physical accessibility, liveability and comfort of the facilities", 15 items in 3 sub-areas of "Access to information, streamlining and transparency", and 20 items in 4 sub-areas of "Taking care of the relationship with patients and citizens". Overall values of Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.77 and 0.90, showing high consistency.
conclusionsThis study validated a "core" checklist that can be routinely used to monitor the implementation of person-centred care in Italian hospitals. The tool can be applied more widely by multiple stakeholders as a measurement instrument for the participatory evaluation of person-centredness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.