ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Preoperative risk assessment and optimization integrating surgical and anesthetic principles and practices: a national survey for internists.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of procedure-specific risks into preoperative patient assessment and optimization are crucial aspects of perioperative care. However, data on internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices are limited. We thus sought to identify internists' knowledge gaps in terms of surgical- and anesthetic-specific risk factors and characteristics.
methodsAn open and voluntary e-survey was conducted via LimeSurvey between April and July 2021 to evaluate Canadian internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices. The survey included the perceived importance and knowledge of several key surgical and anesthetic aspects, such as surgery duration, procedure-specific cardiac risk, bleeding risk, and thrombotic risk. It also assessed pre- and post-survey self-reported confidence levels in one's knowledge of these characteristics. Finally, we investigated how internists optimize some of the preoperative risks.
resultsA total of 173 Canadian internists opened the survey link, and 121 completed it (completion rate 70%). While the majority of respondents considered surgical and anesthetic principles and practices as important, most identified knowledge gaps. Participants generally estimated surgery duration and procedure-specific cardiac risk adequately. However, they tended to underestimate procedure-specific bleeding risk for general (58%) and orthopedic (76%) surgeries and to overestimate procedure-specific thrombotic risk for vascular (63%) and genitourinary (60%) surgeries. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate hemoglobin A1c target and 0% of respondents reported using the guideline-suggested hemoglobin threshold for investigation and intervention.
conclusionsOverall, our findings identify significant knowledge gaps among Canadian internists in preoperative assessment of procedure-specific risk factors and can be used to inform both the development of educational initiatives and future research to improve the quality of preoperative patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.