Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806457›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of pre-and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Yueting Tan, Bei'er Hu, Qian Li, Wen Cao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Systemic inflammation and prognosis in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving anti-EGFR therapy: A real-world cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yueting Tan *Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 233, Cai'e North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, China.
Bei'er Hu *Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 233, Cai'e North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, China.
Qian LiHunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 233, Cai'e North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, China.
Wen CaoHunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 233, Cai'e North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, China. Cwfly2008@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the association between systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has remained a topic of considerable debate. To address this, the present study was carried out to investigate the prognostic significance of SII in CRC.

methodsDatabases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were scrutinized up to March 27, 2024. The relationship between pre- and post-treatment SII levels and the prognosis of CRC was evaluated. Following literature screening, quality assessment, and extraction of outcome measures, a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's test.

resultsA total of 27 studies were included in the analysis. Pooled results demonstrated that a high SII level was associated with poor overall survival (OS, HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.40-2.26), progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26-2.56), disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.43-2.56), and recurrence-free survival (RFS, HR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.58-6.88). Notably, the association between pre-treatment SII and OS, PFS, and DFS was stronger than that observed for post-treatment SII, indicating that treatment may attenuate the predictive valueof SII for survival outcomes. Additionally, elevated SII was correlated with poor tumor differentiation, tumor location in the rectum, and larger tumor size ≥ 5 cm.

conclusionOur meta-analysis suggested that a high SII is a predictor of poor prognosis in CRC patients. High SII levels were strongly correlated with inferior OS, PFS, DFS, and RFS. The relationship between SII and survival outcomes was attenuated post-treatment compared to pre-treatment. Additionally, elevated SII was correlated with clinicopathological factors in CRC patients. These findings suggest that SII can serve as an independent prognostic indicator for CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsInflammationHumansPrognosisSurvival RateColorectal cancerMeta-analysisPrognosisRisk factorsSystemic immune-inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID39806457
PMCPMC11731527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.