Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806453›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Nurse worry as a trigger for rapid response team activation improving outcomes: a retrospective cohort study in non-critical units.

Luana L S Gentil, Milena S Nascimento, Michele Jaures, Leonardo P de Carvalho, Claudia R Laselva, Simone Brandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luana L S GentilDepartamento de Clínica Médica-Cirúrgica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Milena S NascimentoDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil. milena.nascimento@einstein.br.
Michele JauresDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Leonardo P de CarvalhoDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Claudia R LaselvaDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Simone BrandiDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients hospitalized outside of monitored environments may experience sudden clinical worsening requiring transfer to the Intensive Care Unit. Early detection based on the clinical nurse's identification of the risk of clinical deterioration represents an opportunity to prevent serious adverse events. Nurse worry is defined as the use of clinical reasoning combined with intuition that precedes the patient's clinical deterioration.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate nurse worry as a trigger for rapid response team activation in patients hospitalized in non-critical units and its association with the need in ICU admission.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data retrieved from an anonymized institutional database used to monitor the actions of the rapid response team. Data collected from January 2021 to December 2022 were analyzed, encompassing patients over 18 years old admitted to non-critical units and evaluated by the rapid response team. Analyzed variables included demographic characteristics, MEWS score, and causes for activating the rapid response team, such as changes in vital signs and nurse worry. Main outcomes assessed were transfer to the ICU, medical procedures, and drug administration. Patients were divided into three groups for analysis: those triggered for RRT assessment exclusively by changes in vital signs, those triggered exclusively by nurse worry and those triggered by the nurse worry combined with changes in vital signs.

resultsA total of 4634 rapid response team consultations were included, with 1574 triggered by changes in vital signs, 1263 triggered by nurse worry and 1797 triggered by the nurse worry associated with changes in vital signs. The group with nurse concern showed a lower need for transfers to the ICU (40%) compared to the group with changes in vital signs (50%) p < 0.001 although there was no difference in relation to the need for medical procedures,17% in both groups.

conclusionThe NW emerges as a relevant factor in triggering RRT and may be associated with improved outcomes, such as reduced need for ICU transfers. However, the observational design of the study does not allow for establishing causal relationships.

Indexed as

Clinical observationNurse worryRapid response team

Identifiers

PMID39806453
PMCPMC11727266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.