Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806440›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2025

Potential drug targets for asthma identified through mendelian randomization analysis.

Xingxuan Chen, Yu Shang, Danting Shen, Si Shi, Zhe Wen, Lijuan Li, Hong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ADAM19: biological characteristics and implications in disease pathology and clinical applications.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xingxuan Chen *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Yu Shang *Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150001, China.
Danting Shen *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Si ShiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Zhe WenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Lijuan LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Diseases, Friendship Hospital, 100029, Beijing, China. lilijuan236@126.com.
Hong ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China. chenhong744563@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of new molecular targeted drugs marks a breakthrough in asthma treatment, particularly for severe cases. Yet, options for moderate-to-severe asthma treatment remain limited, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic drug targets. In this study, we aimed to identify new treatment targets for asthma using the Mendelian randomization method and large-scale genome-wide association data (GWAS).

methodsWe utilized GWAS data from the UK Biobank (comprising 56,167 patients and 352,255 control subjects) and the FinnGen cohort (including 23,834 patients and 228,085 control subjects). Genetic instruments for 734 plasma proteins and 154 cerebrospinal fluid proteins were derived from recently published GWAS. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis, Steiger filtering, colocalization, and phenotype scanning were employed for reverse causal inference detection, further substantiating the Mendelian randomization results. A protein-protein interaction network was also constructed to reveal potential associations between proteins and asthma medications.

resultsUnder Bonferroni significance conditions, Mendelian randomization analysis revealed causal relationships between seven proteins and asthma. In plasma, we observed that an increase of one standard deviation in IL1R1[1.30 (95% CI 1.20-1.42)], IL7R[1.07 (95% CI 1.04-1.11)], ECM1[1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.05)], and CD200R1[1.18 (95% CI 1.09-1.27)] were associated with an increased risk of asthma, while an increase in ADAM19 [0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.92)] was found to be protective. In the brain, each 10-fold increase in IL-6 sRa [1.29 (95% CI 1.15-1.45)] was associated with an increased risk of asthma, while an increase in Layilin [0.61 (95% CI 0.51-0.73)] was found to be protective. None of the seven proteins exhibited a reverse causal relationship. Colocalization analysis indicated that ECM1 (coloc.abf-PPH4 = 0.953), IL-6 sRa (coloc.abf-PPH4 = 0.966), and layilin (coloc.abf-PPH4 = 0.975) shared the same genetic variation as in asthma.

conclusionA causal relationship exists between genetically determined protein levels of IL1R1, IL7R, ECM1, CD200R1, ADAM19, IL-6 sRa, and Layilin (LAYN) and asthma. Moreover, the identified proteins may serve as attractive drug targets for asthma, especially ECM1 and Layilin (LAYN). However, further research is required to comprehensively understand the roles of these proteins in the occurrence and progression of asthma.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaGenome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisMolecular Targeted TherapyCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaCerebrospinal fluid proteinsDrug targetsMendelian randomizationPlasma proteinsTherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID39806440
PMCPMC11730137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.