Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806425›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Assessment of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture versus a competitor barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure after gynaecology surgery, study protocol of a randomized controlled trial - BARHYSTER.

Petra Baumann, Lourdes Hinojosa Sánchez, Núria Grané Garcia, Larisa Sologiuc, Amadeus Hornemann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06024109 (Prospective, International, Randomized, Multicentric, Controlled Study on the Performance of SYMMCORA® Mid-term Unidirectional Barbed Suture Versus V-loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06024109 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective, International, Randomized, Multicentric, Controlled Study on the Performance of SYMMCORA® Mid-term Unidirectional Barbed Suture Versus V-loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorAesculap AGRan2024 to 2027Enrolled132ConditionsAbnormal Uterine Bleeding, Endometriosis, Uterine Prolapse, Uterine CancerArmsClosure of the Vaginal Cuff after Total Hysterectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra BaumannDepartment of Medical Scientific Affairs, Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany. petra.baumann@aesculap.de.
Lourdes Hinojosa SánchezDepartment of Gynaecology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa, Manresa, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria Grané GarciaDepartment of Gynaecology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa, Manresa, Barcelona, Spain.
Larisa SologiucDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Amadeus HornemannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.

Funding

B.Braun Surgical SA, Rubi, Spain Grant ID not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is nowadays the standard to treat benign and malignant disease occurring in the uterus, but the number of robotic-assisted surgeries is increasing worldwide. To facilitate the handling of sutures in a bi- and tri-dimensional plane, a new type of suture material has been developed, named barbed sutures, which are in use in different indications. In comparison to conventional suture materials, the barbs anchor the suture in the tissue, provide tissue approximation and prevent slippage without the need for knot tying. Several meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown that they are safe and efficient. The current study investigates the clinical outcome of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture which differs in its configuration from other barbed sutures. The collected data will be prospectively compared to the results of a competitor's unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture and retrospectively to the findings reported for conventional sutures after hysterectomy in the literature.

methodsAn international, randomised, multicentric, single-blinded design was chosen. A total of 132 patients will be included receiving randomly either the novel unidirectional barbed suture versus the competitor unidirectional barbed suture in a 3:1 ratio. Both suture materials will be applied to close the vaginal cuff after laparoscopic hysterectomy and the time for suturing is the primary endpoint. As secondary objectives, the following parameters will be collected and compared in both suture groups: intraoperative handling of the suture material, quality of life using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), patient satisfaction, pain, and complications occurring in the short-term and long-term follow-up. For each patient, the study lasts 6 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the clinical performance of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture material for the first time in gynaecology surgery and, to our knowledge, it will be the second largest RCT performed so far in total laparoscopic hysterectomy using unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture materials.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered before the enrolment of the first patient. Registration was performed under www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , NCT06024109. Registered on 15 August, 2023.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLaparoscopySuturesSuture TechniquesVaginaAdultFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeBarbed sutureHysterectomyKnotless sutureLaparoscopic surgeryMinimal invasive surgeryVaginal cuff closure

Identifiers

PMID39806425
PMCPMC11730796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.